<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: These Human Contraptions: Art or Design</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bureaux.petitemort.org/2009/03/30/these-human-contraptions-art-or-design/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bureaux.petitemort.org/2009/03/30/these-human-contraptions-art-or-design/</link>
	<description>tracking the cult of vision (for vizKult.org)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 21:43:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antonio</title>
		<link>http://bureaux.petitemort.org/2009/03/30/these-human-contraptions-art-or-design/comment-page-1/#comment-203957</link>
		<dc:creator>Antonio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 21:43:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bureaux.petitemort.org/?p=326#comment-203957</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m just reading Panofsky&#039;s Essay &quot;History of Art as a Humanistic Discipline&quot;  1940. He has some interesting things to say about art and design...

• natural object -have the option to be experienced aesthetically  or not (as art). But Natural objects contain &#039;intention&#039; (will argue it has a super-function)

• Man-made objects - objects that either demand or do not demand to be experienced aesthetically. These can be browken down into &quot;practical objects&quot; and &quot;art objects&quot;

• Practical objects - are man-made objects that don&#039;t have the need to be experienced aesthetically. Practical objects broken into two types: &#039;vehicles for communication&#039; and &#039;apparatus&#039; or &#039;tools&#039;. These practical objects are intended to fill a function.

• Art objects - are man-made objects that need to be experienced aesthetically. These too can fall into the categories of  &#039;vehicles for communication&#039; and &#039;apparatus&#039; or &#039;tools&#039;. 

• Both art objects and practical objects have form 
(it&#039;s part of coming to existence, at least this was the case before conceptual art)

• Both art objects and practical objects have ideas.

• When ideas and forms are balanced,the more &#039;elloquantly&#039; it is to get content from it. When one over shadows the other, content is reduced. He gives the example of a spinning wheel as a strong idea with little content and an abstract painting as strong form with little content.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m just reading Panofsky&#8217;s Essay &#8220;History of Art as a Humanistic Discipline&#8221;  1940. He has some interesting things to say about art and design&#8230;</p>
<p>• natural object -have the option to be experienced aesthetically  or not (as art). But Natural objects contain &#8216;intention&#8217; (will argue it has a super-function)</p>
<p>• Man-made objects &#8211; objects that either demand or do not demand to be experienced aesthetically. These can be browken down into &#8220;practical objects&#8221; and &#8220;art objects&#8221;</p>
<p>• Practical objects &#8211; are man-made objects that don&#8217;t have the need to be experienced aesthetically. Practical objects broken into two types: &#8216;vehicles for communication&#8217; and &#8216;apparatus&#8217; or &#8216;tools&#8217;. These practical objects are intended to fill a function.</p>
<p>• Art objects &#8211; are man-made objects that need to be experienced aesthetically. These too can fall into the categories of  &#8216;vehicles for communication&#8217; and &#8216;apparatus&#8217; or &#8216;tools&#8217;. </p>
<p>• Both art objects and practical objects have form<br />
(it&#8217;s part of coming to existence, at least this was the case before conceptual art)</p>
<p>• Both art objects and practical objects have ideas.</p>
<p>• When ideas and forms are balanced,the more &#8216;elloquantly&#8217; it is to get content from it. When one over shadows the other, content is reduced. He gives the example of a spinning wheel as a strong idea with little content and an abstract painting as strong form with little content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bureaux. The Editors&#8217; Blog at petiteMort.org &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Art, Design, and Copyright Between the Two.</title>
		<link>http://bureaux.petitemort.org/2009/03/30/these-human-contraptions-art-or-design/comment-page-1/#comment-193731</link>
		<dc:creator>Bureaux. The Editors&#8217; Blog at petiteMort.org &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Art, Design, and Copyright Between the Two.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:43:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bureaux.petitemort.org/?p=326#comment-193731</guid>
		<description>[...] Home     &#171; These Human Contraptions: Art or Design [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Home     &laquo; These Human Contraptions: Art or Design [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
